International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (1996)

E727463

The International Court of Justice’s 1996 advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons is a landmark legal assessment that examined whether nuclear weapons could ever be lawful under international law and clarified states’ obligations to pursue nuclear disarmament in good faith.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (2)

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf ICJ advisory opinion
international legal instrument
judicial decision
appliesPrinciple Martens Clause NERFINISHED
principle of distinction between civilians and combatants
principle of proportionality in the use of force
prohibition of indiscriminate weapons
prohibition of unnecessary suffering
protection of the natural environment in armed conflict
askedQuestion Is the threat or use of nuclear weapons in any circumstance permitted under international law?
author International Court of Justice NERFINISHED
bindingOn none (advisory opinion only)
citation Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996 NERFINISHED
conclusion Court could not definitively conclude on legality or illegality of use of nuclear weapons in an extreme circumstance of self‑defence in which the very survival of a State would be at stake
no comprehensive and universal prohibition of the threat or use of nuclear weapons as such exists in conventional or customary international law
states are under an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control
threat or use of nuclear weapons must comply with principles and rules of international humanitarian law
threat or use of nuclear weapons must comply with requirements of the UN Charter, particularly on self‑defence and use of force
threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict
contains dissenting opinions by several judges
separate opinions by several judges
date 8 July 1996
field disarmament law
international humanitarian law
international law
law of armed conflict
influenced interpretation of Article VI of the NPT
positions of non‑nuclear‑weapon states in multilateral disarmament forums
subsequent debates on nuclear disarmament
interprets Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter
Article 51 of the United Nations Charter
Article VI of the Treaty on the Non‑Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
language English
French
legalStatus advisory and non‑binding
majorityDecision delivered by a narrow majority of judges
recognizedAs authoritative interpretation of states’ obligation to pursue nuclear disarmament in good faith
landmark decision in the law of nuclear weapons
relatedTo Treaty on the Non‑Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons NERFINISHED
United Nations General Assembly resolution 49/75 K NERFINISHED
customary international humanitarian law
requestedBy United Nations General Assembly NERFINISHED
seatOfCourt Peace Palace, The Hague, Netherlands NERFINISHED
subject legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons
topic conditions for lawful self‑defence under the UN Charter
legality of nuclear deterrence doctrines
year 1996

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Article VI interpretedBy International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (1996)
subject surface form: Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
Common Article 1 citedIn International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (1996)
this entity surface form: ICJ Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion