Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan
E655798
Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan is a leading UK Privy Council decision in trust and equity law that clarified the test for accessory liability for dishonest assistance in breach of trust.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7296862 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan Context triple: [Lord Hoffmann, notableWork, Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan]
-
A.
Syariah Court of Singapore
The Syariah Court of Singapore is a specialized religious court that administers Muslim personal and family law, particularly matters such as marriage, divorce, and inheritance, for the Muslim community in Singapore.
-
B.
Malindo Air
Malindo Air is a Malaysian hybrid full-service and low-cost airline that became the first operator of the Boeing 737 MAX 8.
-
C.
Malaysia Aviation Group
Malaysia Aviation Group is a Malaysian state-owned aviation holding company that oversees Malaysia Airlines and several related aviation and travel businesses.
-
D.
Malaysian airspace
Malaysian airspace is the sovereign airspace above Malaysia’s land and territorial waters, controlled and managed by Malaysian civil and military aviation authorities.
-
E.
Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad
Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad is a Malaysian airport operator that manages and maintains most of the country’s major airports, including both domestic and international hubs.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan Target entity description: Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan is a leading UK Privy Council decision in trust and equity law that clarified the test for accessory liability for dishonest assistance in breach of trust.
-
A.
Syariah Court of Singapore
The Syariah Court of Singapore is a specialized religious court that administers Muslim personal and family law, particularly matters such as marriage, divorce, and inheritance, for the Muslim community in Singapore.
-
B.
Malindo Air
Malindo Air is a Malaysian hybrid full-service and low-cost airline that became the first operator of the Boeing 737 MAX 8.
-
C.
Malaysia Aviation Group
Malaysia Aviation Group is a Malaysian state-owned aviation holding company that oversees Malaysia Airlines and several related aviation and travel businesses.
-
D.
Malaysian airspace
Malaysian airspace is the sovereign airspace above Malaysia’s land and territorial waters, controlled and managed by Malaysian civil and military aviation authorities.
-
E.
Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad
Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad is a Malaysian airport operator that manages and maintains most of the country’s major airports, including both domestic and international hubs.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (34)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Privy Council case
ⓘ
judicial decision ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
accessory liability
ⓘ
dishonest assistance ⓘ equity ⓘ trust law ⓘ |
| citationJurisdiction | Brunei Darussalam NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| countryOfCourt | United Kingdom NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| court | Judicial Committee of the Privy Council NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| holding | Tan was liable for dishonest assistance in breach of trust NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| importance |
leading authority on dishonest assistance in equity
ⓘ
seminal case on accessory liability for breach of trust ⓘ |
| influenced |
Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley NERFINISHED ⓘ subsequent UK and Commonwealth case law on dishonest assistance ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | United Kingdom ⓘ |
| lawReportCitation | [1995] 3 All ER 97 ⓘ |
| lawReportCitation | [1995] 3 WLR 64 ⓘ |
| leadingJudge | Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalPrinciple |
clarified that negligence alone is insufficient for dishonest assistance
ⓘ
confirmed that accessory liability is personal, not proprietary ⓘ defined dishonesty by reference to objective standards of ordinary decent people ⓘ emphasised that honesty is to be judged in light of all the circumstances known to the defendant ⓘ established that liability for dishonest assistance is based on the dishonesty of the accessory ⓘ held that the trustee’s state of mind is not determinative for accessory liability ⓘ rejected a requirement of knowledge categories for dishonest assistance ⓘ |
| neutralCitation | [1995] 2 AC 378 ⓘ |
| overruledOrQualified | earlier approaches relying on Baden categories of knowledge ⓘ |
| panelMember |
Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
other Law Lords ⓘ |
| party |
Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Tan NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | breach of trust by a travel agent handling airline ticket monies ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1995 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan Description of subject: Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan is a leading UK Privy Council decision in trust and equity law that clarified the test for accessory liability for dishonest assistance in breach of trust.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.