Support for the Walker Tariff of 1846
E63351
Support for the Walker Tariff of 1846 refers to George M. Dallas’s politically consequential decision as U.S. vice president to cast the tie-breaking Senate vote that secured passage of the low-tariff Walker Tariff, reshaping mid-19th-century American trade policy.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Support for the Walker Tariff of 1846 canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T508130 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Support for the Walker Tariff of 1846 Context triple: [George M. Dallas, notableWork, Support for the Walker Tariff of 1846]
-
A.
Fordney–McCumber Tariff
The Fordney–McCumber Tariff was a 1922 U.S. law that sharply raised import duties to protect American industry and agriculture during the post–World War I era.
-
B.
Bourbon Reforms
The Bourbon Reforms were a series of 18th-century administrative and economic changes imposed by the Spanish Crown to strengthen imperial control and revenue, which ultimately provoked colonial discontent and helped set the stage for independence movements in Latin America.
-
C.
Corn Laws debate
The Corn Laws debate was a major 19th-century British political and economic controversy over tariffs on imported grain, pitting free-trade advocates against protectionists and shaping modern economic and trade policy.
-
D.
Kansas–Nebraska Act
The Kansas–Nebraska Act was an 1854 U.S. law that created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and inflamed sectional tensions by allowing settlers there to decide the legality of slavery through popular sovereignty, effectively nullifying the Missouri Compromise.
-
E.
Compromise of 1850
The Compromise of 1850 was a package of U.S. laws intended to ease sectional tensions over slavery and territorial expansion, notably admitting California as a free state while strengthening the Fugitive Slave Act.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Support for the Walker Tariff of 1846 Target entity description: Support for the Walker Tariff of 1846 refers to George M. Dallas’s politically consequential decision as U.S. vice president to cast the tie-breaking Senate vote that secured passage of the low-tariff Walker Tariff, reshaping mid-19th-century American trade policy.
-
A.
Fordney–McCumber Tariff
The Fordney–McCumber Tariff was a 1922 U.S. law that sharply raised import duties to protect American industry and agriculture during the post–World War I era.
-
B.
Bourbon Reforms
The Bourbon Reforms were a series of 18th-century administrative and economic changes imposed by the Spanish Crown to strengthen imperial control and revenue, which ultimately provoked colonial discontent and helped set the stage for independence movements in Latin America.
-
C.
Corn Laws debate
The Corn Laws debate was a major 19th-century British political and economic controversy over tariffs on imported grain, pitting free-trade advocates against protectionists and shaping modern economic and trade policy.
-
D.
Kansas–Nebraska Act
The Kansas–Nebraska Act was an 1854 U.S. law that created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and inflamed sectional tensions by allowing settlers there to decide the legality of slavery through popular sovereignty, effectively nullifying the Missouri Compromise.
-
E.
Compromise of 1850
The Compromise of 1850 was a package of U.S. laws intended to ease sectional tensions over slavery and territorial expansion, notably admitting California as a free state while strengthening the Fugitive Slave Act.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
event in 19th-century American economic policy
ⓘ
event in United States political history ⓘ political decision ⓘ vice-presidential tie-breaking vote ⓘ |
| appliesToJurisdiction |
United States government
ⓘ
surface form:
United States federal government
|
| chronologicallyFollows | Tariff of 1842 debates ⓘ |
| chronologicallyPrecedes | Tariff of 1857 debates ⓘ |
| country | United States of America ⓘ |
| decisionMaker | George M. Dallas ⓘ |
| describedBySource |
Congressional Record
ⓘ
surface form:
United States Senate historical records
biographies of George M. Dallas ⓘ |
| economicContext |
debate over revenue needs versus industrial protection in the United States
ⓘ
expanding international trade in the mid-19th century ⓘ |
| hasCause |
Democratic Party commitment to lower tariffs
ⓘ
James K. Polk’s campaign promises for tariff reduction ⓘ Robert J. Walker’s advocacy of a low-revenue tariff system ⓘ tie vote in the United States Senate on the Walker Tariff bill ⓘ |
| hasEffect |
contribution to the decline of George M. Dallas’s future presidential prospects
ⓘ
damage to George M. Dallas’s political standing in his home state of Pennsylvania ⓘ increased opposition among Northern and Mid-Atlantic protectionists ⓘ increased satisfaction among Southern and Western free-trade advocates ⓘ passage of the Walker Tariff of 1846 ⓘ political backlash in protectionist regions such as Pennsylvania ⓘ realignment of sectional interests over tariff policy ⓘ reduction of United States tariff rates ⓘ shift toward revenue tariffs rather than protective tariffs in the United States ⓘ strengthening of free-trade policies in mid-19th-century United States ⓘ weakening of high-tariff protectionist policy in the United States ⓘ |
| hasLocation |
Senate chamber
ⓘ
surface form:
United States Senate chamber
|
| hasParticipant |
Democratic Party
ⓘ
surface form:
Democratic Party (United States)
George M. Dallas ⓘ James K. Polk ⓘ
surface form:
James K. Polk administration
United States Senate ⓘ |
| involves |
Walker Tariff of 1846
ⓘ
tie-breaking vote of the vice president of the United States ⓘ |
| legalOutcome | enactment of the Walker Tariff as federal law ⓘ |
| officeHeldByDecisionMaker | Vice President of the United States ⓘ |
| opposedPolicy | high protective tariff policy ⓘ |
| partOf |
mid-19th-century United States tariff controversies
ⓘ
tariff debates in the 29th United States Congress ⓘ |
| pointInTime |
1846
ⓘ
July 1846 ⓘ |
| politicalContext |
Democratic Party dominance in the 1840s
ⓘ
sectional conflict over economic policy in the antebellum United States ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
James K. Polk
ⓘ
Robert J. Walker ⓘ Tariff of 1842 debates ⓘ
surface form:
Tariff of 1842
Tariff of 1857 ⓘ |
| supportedPolicy | low-tariff trade policy ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Support for the Walker Tariff of 1846 Description of subject: Support for the Walker Tariff of 1846 refers to George M. Dallas’s politically consequential decision as U.S. vice president to cast the tie-breaking Senate vote that secured passage of the low-tariff Walker Tariff, reshaping mid-19th-century American trade policy.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.