FDIC v. Meyer

E494927

FDIC v. Meyer is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the limits of suing the federal government and its agencies for constitutional violations under the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (39)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
federal courts case
aroseFrom employment dispute involving a former employee of a federally chartered savings and loan association
clarifies limits on suing the federal government for constitutional violations
that sovereign immunity bars constitutional tort claims for damages directly against federal agencies absent explicit waiver
hasAreaOfLaw administrative law
constitutional law
federal courts
hasCitation 510 U.S. 471
hasCountry United States of America
surface form: United States
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED
hasDecisionDate 1994-02-23
hasDecisionType majority opinion
hasDecisionYear 1994
hasDocketNumber 92-741
hasHolding Bivens actions are limited to suits against individual federal officers in their personal capacities
a Bivens cause of action cannot be maintained against a federal agency
federal agencies are not proper defendants in suits seeking damages for constitutional violations under Bivens
hasImpact limited the expansion of Bivens remedies
reinforced sovereign immunity protections for federal agencies
hasJurisdiction federal question jurisdiction
hasKeyTerm damages remedy for constitutional violations
federal agency liability
implied cause of action
hasLanguage English
hasLegalIssue scope of sovereign immunity for federal agencies in constitutional tort claims
whether a Bivens cause of action can be implied directly against a federal agency
hasOpinionAuthor Justice Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED
hasPetitioner Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation NERFINISHED
hasPriorHistory on appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
hasRespondent Meyer NERFINISHED
hasUSReportsPage 471
hasUSReportsVolume 510
involvesConstitutionalProvision Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause NERFINISHED
involvesLegalDoctrine Bivens action NERFINISHED
constitutional torts
sovereign immunity
isCitedFor distinction between suits against individual officers and suits against the United States or its agencies
proposition that Bivens does not extend to federal agencies

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.