Tudor chroniclers
E48885
Tudor chroniclers were early modern English historians writing under Tudor rule whose often partisan accounts helped shape the traditional, largely negative image of figures like King Richard III.
Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
group of historians
→
historiographical tradition → |
| country |
Kingdom of England
→
|
| employer |
Tudor dynasty
→
|
| endTime |
1603
→
|
| fieldOfWork |
historiography
→
history → |
| genre |
chronicle
→
political history → royal biography → |
| hasEffect |
contributed to a largely negative image of Richard III of England
→
reinforced Tudor claims to the English throne → shaped later perceptions of the Wars of the Roses → |
| influenced |
Shakespearean history plays
→
William Shakespeare → traditional historiography of Richard III → |
| influencedBy |
Tudor propaganda
→
humanist historiography → |
| knownFor |
legitimizing Tudor rule through historical narrative
→
producing partisan accounts of late medieval English history → shaping the traditional image of Richard III of England → |
| language |
English
→
|
| mainSubject |
English Reformation
→
Wars of the Roses → reign of Henry VII of England → reign of Henry VIII of England → reign of Richard III of England → succession disputes in England → |
| notableMember |
Edward Hall
→
George Cavendish → John Foxe → John Stow → Polydore Vergil → Raphael Holinshed → Robert Fabyan → William Camden → |
| notableWork |
Tudor historiography of the Wars of the Roses
→
early modern narratives of Richard III → |
| patron |
Edward VI of England
→
Elizabeth I of England → Henry VII of England → Henry VIII of England → Mary I of England → |
| politicalAlignment |
anti-Yorkist
→
pro-Tudor → |
| startTime |
1485
→
|
| timePeriod |
Tudor period
→
|
| writingStyle |
didactic
→
moralizing → politically partisan → |
Referenced by (1)
| Subject (surface form when different) | Predicate |
|---|---|
|
Historic Doubts on the Life and Reign of King Richard the Third
→
|
criticizesSource |