Naim v. Naim

E465921

Naim v. Naim was a 1955 Virginia Supreme Court case that upheld the state’s ban on interracial marriage and foreshadowed the constitutional issues later resolved in Loving v. Virginia.

Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Virginia Supreme Court case
court case
interracial marriage case
appliedStatute Virginia anti-miscegenation law NERFINISHED
areaOfLaw civil rights law
constitutional law
family law
citationStatus example of pre-Loving anti-miscegenation jurisprudence
constitutionalProvisionDiscussed Due Process Clause NERFINISHED
Equal Protection Clause NERFINISHED
Fourteenth Amendment NERFINISHED
context Jim Crow–era racial segregation laws in the United States
country United States of America
surface form: United States
courtReasoning state’s interest in preserving racial integrity justified the ban
decisionDate 1955
era 1950s American civil rights context
foreshadowed constitutional issues later resolved in Loving v. Virginia
geographicScope Commonwealth of Virginia NERFINISHED
held Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage was constitutional
historicalSignificance illustrated judicial acceptance of racial segregation in marriage before the civil rights era peak
impact demonstrated reluctance of some courts to apply equal protection robustly to racial classifications in marriage
jurisdiction Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia NERFINISHED
legalDoctrineApplied conflict of laws regarding out-of-state marriages
state police power over marriage
legalIssue constitutionality of interracial marriage ban
validity of anti-miscegenation statute
legalStatusOfStatuteAfterCase Virginia anti-miscegenation law remained in force
levelOfCourt state supreme court
marriageTypeAtIssue interracial marriage
party Han Say Naim NERFINISHED
Ruby Elaine Naim NERFINISHED
precedentFor state enforcement of anti-miscegenation laws prior to Loving v. Virginia
raceClassification white person and non-white person
recognizedPrinciple states could refuse recognition of marriages contrary to strong public policy at that time
relatedCase Loving v. Virginia NERFINISHED
result state’s ban on interracial marriage upheld
rightsImplicated freedom from racial discrimination in marriage
right to marry
state Virginia
subjectMatter validity of an interracial marriage contracted outside Virginia
subsequentDevelopment reasoning effectively repudiated by Loving v. Virginia
temporalRelationTo preceded Loving v. Virginia
timePeriod post–Brown v. Board of Education era

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.