Semi-Arianism

E392165

Semi-Arianism was a 4th-century Christian theological position that sought a middle ground between Arianism and Nicene orthodoxy by affirming the Son’s likeness to, but distinction from, the Father in substance.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Semi-Arianism canonical 2

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf 4th-century Christian doctrine
Christian theological position
Trinitarian theological view
affirms likeness of the Son to the Father
aimedTo preserve monotheism while affirming the Son’s divinity
associatedWithCouncil Council of Ancyra
Council of Seleucia
Council of Sirmium
condemnedBy pro-Nicene theologians
consideredByOpponents form of Arianism
consideredBySomeModernScholars distinct theological movement from strict Arianism
contrastsWith Arianism
surface form: Anomoean Arianism

Nicene doctrine of consubstantial Trinity
debatedIn 4th-century episcopal synods
declinedAfter First Council of Constantinople
surface form: Council of Constantinople (381)
denies identity of substance between Father and Son as taught by Nicaea
distinguishes the substance of the Son from the substance of the Father
emergedAs middle position between Arianism and Nicene orthodoxy
eventuallySupersededBy Nicene Christianity
surface form: Nicene orthodoxy
geographicalCenter Byzantine Empire
surface form: Eastern Roman Empire
historicalContext post-Nicene Trinitarian controversies
historicalPeriod 4th century
influenced imperial church politics in the 4th century
involvesDebateOver meaning of ousia (substance) and hypostasis (person)
keyConcept likeness in substance (homoiousios)
rejection of the Nicene homoousios
subordination of the Son to the Father
languageOfCreeds emphasized likeness (homoios) rather than identity
opposes full Nicene consubstantiality
radical Arian subordinationism
prefersTerm homoiousios
rejects the Nicene term homoousios
relatedTo Arianism
Homoiousian theology
surface form: Homoiousianism

Nicene Christianity
religiousTradition Christianity
teaches the Son is like the Father in substance
the Son is of similar substance to the Father
usesScripturalAppealsTo Johannine and Pauline Christological texts
viewedByLaterOrthodoxyAs heresy
viewOfSon begotten of the Father before all ages
distinct hypostasis from the Father
viewOfTrinity hierarchical order within the Godhead

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.