Dyson’s proof of equivalence of Feynman and Schwinger–Tomonaga formulations of QED

E17385

Dyson’s proof of equivalence of Feynman and Schwinger–Tomonaga formulations of QED is a landmark theoretical result that rigorously demonstrated the mathematical consistency and mutual compatibility of different approaches to quantum electrodynamics.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (4)

Statements (44)

Predicate Object
instanceOf result in quantum electrodynamics
theoretical physics result
author Freeman Dyson
clarifies relationship between Feynman diagrams and operator methods
status of Feynman diagrams as a systematic expansion
concerns covariant formulation of QED
operator formalism in QED
path-integral inspired Feynman diagram method
context postwar development of relativistic quantum field theory
resolution of infinities in quantum electrodynamics
demonstratesEquivalenceOf Feynman path integral
surface form: Feynman formulation of QED

Tomonaga–Schwinger equation
surface form: Schwinger–Tomonaga formulation of QED

Tomonaga–Schwinger equation
surface form: Tomonaga–Schwinger formalism
establishes mathematical consistency between different QED formulations
mutual compatibility of Feynman and Schwinger–Tomonaga approaches
field quantum electrodynamics
quantum field theory
historicalPeriod late 1940s
influenced pedagogical treatments of perturbative QED
subsequent work on axiomatic quantum field theory
involves comparison of S-matrix elements
covariant perturbation expansion
expansion of the S-matrix in powers of the coupling constant
time-ordered exponential of the interaction Hamiltonian
relatedToPerson Julian Schwinger
Richard Feynman
Sin-Itiro Tomonaga
relatedWork S-matrix
surface form: Dyson’s papers on the S-matrix in quantum electrodynamics
relatesTo Feynman diagrams
Tomonaga–Schwinger equation
covariant commutation relations
shows Feynman rules reproduce Tomonaga–Schwinger operator results order by order
Lorentz invariance of the perturbation expansion can be maintained
diagrammatic expansion corresponds to time-ordered products of interaction terms
significance contributed to acceptance of Feynman diagram technique
helped unify competing formulations of QED
landmark result in the development of renormalized QED
provided rigorous foundation for perturbative QED calculations
supports view that different QED formalisms are representations of the same underlying theory
usesConcept Dyson series
S-matrix
interaction picture
perturbation theory in QED
time-ordered products

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Freeman Dyson notableWork Dyson’s proof of equivalence of Feynman and Schwinger–Tomonaga formulations of QED
Sin-Itiro Tomonaga notableWork Dyson’s proof of equivalence of Feynman and Schwinger–Tomonaga formulations of QED
this entity surface form: Relativistic formulation of quantum field theory
Dyson notableWork Dyson’s proof of equivalence of Feynman and Schwinger–Tomonaga formulations of QED
subject surface form: Freeman Dyson
this entity surface form: Dyson’s formulation of quantum electrodynamics
Gell-Mann–Low theorem implies Dyson’s proof of equivalence of Feynman and Schwinger–Tomonaga formulations of QED
this entity surface form: Dyson series expansion for the S-matrix