Interactive Proofs and the Hardness of Approximating Cliques

E17354

"Interactive Proofs and the Hardness of Approximating Cliques" is a seminal theoretical computer science paper that introduced powerful interactive proof techniques to show that finding near-maximum cliques in graphs is computationally intractable to approximate within strong bounds.


Statements (42)
Predicate Object
instanceOf research paper
theoretical computer science paper
assumes standard complexity assumptions such as P not equal to NP
contribution established that near-maximum cliques are hard to approximate
influenced later work on PCP theorem and inapproximability
introduced powerful interactive proof techniques for hardness of approximation
linked interactive proofs with approximation complexity
establishes gap between exact and approximate solutions for clique
hardness of distinguishing graphs with large cliques from graphs with only small cliques
field computational complexity theory
theoretical computer science
focusesOn gap-introducing reductions
inapproximability results
maximum clique problem
probabilistically checkable proofs
impact seminal work in hardness of approximation
widely cited in theoretical computer science literature
influenced development of PCP-based hardness techniques
subsequent research on inapproximability of combinatorial problems
mainTopic NP-hardness of approximation
approximation algorithms
clique problem
hardness of approximation
interactive proofs
motivation exploring power of interactive proofs beyond decision problems
understanding limits of efficient approximation algorithms
problemDomain combinatorial optimization
graph optimization
provesAbout approximation ratio for maximum clique
limits of polynomial-time approximation algorithms
relatedTo NP-completeness
PCP theorem
graph theory
optimization problems
resultType hardness of approximation theorem
shows interactive proof techniques can yield hardness of approximation results
it is computationally hard to approximate maximum clique within certain factors
strong inapproximability bounds for clique
usesTechnique PCP-style constructions
gap amplification
interactive proof systems
randomized reductions

Referenced by (2)
Subject (surface form when different) Predicate
Johan Håstad ("“Some optimal inapproximability results”")
Shafi Goldwasser
notableWork

Please wait…