Plato's dialogue "Sophist"
E147130
Plato's dialogue "Sophist" is a late philosophical work in which an Eleatic Stranger leads a rigorous inquiry into the nature of the sophist, being and non-being, and the possibility of falsehood.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Plato's Sophist | 1 |
| Plato's dialogue "Sophist" canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1270532 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Plato's dialogue "Sophist" Context triple: [Parmenides, mentionedIn, Plato's dialogue "Sophist"]
-
A.
Plato's dialogue "Parmenides"
Plato's dialogue "Parmenides" is a late, highly abstract philosophical work in which a young Socrates engages with the Eleatic philosopher Parmenides on the problems of Forms, unity, and being.
-
B.
Middle dialogues of Plato
The Middle dialogues of Plato are a group of his philosophical works, including texts like the Phaedo, in which he develops mature theories such as the Theory of Forms and the immortality of the soul through rich dramatic dialogues.
-
C.
"Euthydemus" by Plato
"Euthydemus" by Plato is a Socratic dialogue that satirically examines sophistry and the nature of philosophical argument through conversations between Socrates and the sophists Euthydemus and Dionysodorus.
-
D.
Socratic dialogues of Plato
The Socratic dialogues of Plato are a series of philosophical texts in which Socrates engages interlocutors through probing questions to explore ethics, knowledge, justice, and the nature of reality.
-
E.
Xenophon's Apology of Socrates
Xenophon's Apology of Socrates is a Socratic dialogue in which the historian Xenophon presents an alternative account of Socrates' defense speech and character at his trial, distinct from Plato's more famous version.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Plato's dialogue "Sophist" Target entity description: Plato's dialogue "Sophist" is a late philosophical work in which an Eleatic Stranger leads a rigorous inquiry into the nature of the sophist, being and non-being, and the possibility of falsehood.
-
A.
Plato's dialogue "Parmenides"
Plato's dialogue "Parmenides" is a late, highly abstract philosophical work in which a young Socrates engages with the Eleatic philosopher Parmenides on the problems of Forms, unity, and being.
-
B.
Middle dialogues of Plato
The Middle dialogues of Plato are a group of his philosophical works, including texts like the Phaedo, in which he develops mature theories such as the Theory of Forms and the immortality of the soul through rich dramatic dialogues.
-
C.
"Euthydemus" by Plato
"Euthydemus" by Plato is a Socratic dialogue that satirically examines sophistry and the nature of philosophical argument through conversations between Socrates and the sophists Euthydemus and Dionysodorus.
-
D.
Socratic dialogues of Plato
The Socratic dialogues of Plato are a series of philosophical texts in which Socrates engages interlocutors through probing questions to explore ethics, knowledge, justice, and the nature of reality.
-
E.
Xenophon's Apology of Socrates
Xenophon's Apology of Socrates is a Socratic dialogue in which the historian Xenophon presents an alternative account of Socrates' defense speech and character at his trial, distinct from Plato's more famous version.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Platonic dialogue
ⓘ
philosophical work ⓘ |
| author | Plato ⓘ |
| containsDoctrine |
account of not-being as difference
ⓘ
doctrine of the five great kinds ⓘ method of collection and division ⓘ |
| dialogueForm | dramatic dialogue ⓘ |
| exploresConcept |
being as power or capacity
ⓘ
dialectic ⓘ false statement ⓘ great kinds ⓘ image and appearance ⓘ koinonia of forms ⓘ logos ⓘ philosophy ⓘ sophistry ⓘ |
| featuresCharacter |
Eleatic Stranger
ⓘ
Socrates ⓘ Theaetetus ⓘ Theodorus of Cyrene ⓘ Young Socrates ⓘ |
| genre | Socratic dialogue ⓘ |
| historicalContext | 4th century BCE Greek philosophy ⓘ |
| influenced |
analytic metaphysics
ⓘ
ancient metaphysics ⓘ medieval theories of being and non-being ⓘ modern philosophy of language ⓘ |
| isFollowedBy | Statesman ⓘ |
| isPrecededBy | Theaetetus ⓘ |
| language | Ancient Greek ⓘ |
| mainTheme |
being
ⓘ
definition by division ⓘ nature of the sophist ⓘ non-being ⓘ philosophical method ⓘ possibility of falsehood ⓘ problem of not-being ⓘ |
| narrativeFrame | conversation following Theaetetus ⓘ |
| periodInPlatoCorpus | late dialogue ⓘ |
| philosophicalIssue |
criteria for distinguishing philosopher and sophist
ⓘ
problem of falsehood ⓘ relation between language and reality ⓘ |
| philosophicalTradition | Platonism ⓘ |
| settingLocation | Athens ⓘ |
| traditionallyGroupedWith |
Parmenides
ⓘ
Philebus ⓘ Statesman ⓘ Theaetetus ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Plato's dialogue "Sophist" Description of subject: Plato's dialogue "Sophist" is a late philosophical work in which an Eleatic Stranger leads a rigorous inquiry into the nature of the sophist, being and non-being, and the possibility of falsehood.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.