Doctrine of Lapse
E12251
The Doctrine of Lapse was a controversial annexation policy used by the British East India Company in 19th-century India, allowing it to seize princely states without a direct male heir and significantly fueling resentment that led to the 1857 rebellion.
All labels observed (6)
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
British imperial policy
ⓘ
colonial annexation policy ⓘ |
| aimedTo | consolidate British power in India ⓘ |
| annexedState |
Baghat
ⓘ
Jaitpur ⓘ Jhansi ⓘ Nagpur ⓘ Sambalpur ⓘ Satara ⓘ Udaipur ⓘ
surface form:
Udaipur (in present-day Chhattisgarh)
|
| appliedBy | British East India Company ⓘ |
| appliedDuring | 19th century ⓘ |
| appliedIn | India ⓘ |
| associatedWithPerson |
Lord Dalhousie
ⓘ
surface form:
James Andrew Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie
|
| considered |
controversial
ⓘ
unpopular among Indian rulers ⓘ |
| contributedTo |
causes of the Indian Rebellion of 1857
ⓘ
political resentment in India ⓘ |
| criticizedBy |
Indian independence movement
ⓘ
surface form:
Indian nationalists
Indian princes ⓘ |
| criticizedFor |
disregarding adoption customs in Hindu law
ⓘ
undermining sovereignty of princely states ⓘ |
| domain |
British India
ⓘ
surface form:
British Indian administration
colonial law ⓘ |
| effect |
alienation of traditional elites
ⓘ
expansion of British-controlled territory ⓘ weakening of princely autonomy ⓘ |
| endedBy | Government of India Act 1858 ⓘ |
| endedWhen |
Government of India Act 1858
ⓘ
surface form:
British Crown took direct control of India in 1858
|
| formulatedUnder | Lord Dalhousie ⓘ |
| geographicScope | princely states under British East India Company influence ⓘ |
| hasLanguage | English (official formulation) ⓘ |
| historicalContext | Company rule in India ⓘ |
| inForceFrom | 1848 ⓘ |
| inForceUntil | 1858 ⓘ |
| justifiedAs | doctrine of escheat ⓘ |
| legacy | symbol of colonial injustice in Indian historiography ⓘ |
| legalBasis | denial of recognition to adopted heirs of Indian princes ⓘ |
| notAppliedTo |
Gwalior
ⓘ
Hyderabad ⓘ Jammu and Kashmir ⓘ
surface form:
Kashmir
|
| opposedBy |
Rani Lakshmibai
ⓘ
surface form:
Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi
|
| perceivedAs |
instrument of aggressive imperialism
ⓘ
violation of traditional succession rights ⓘ |
| principle | princely state without a natural male heir would lapse to the Company ⓘ |
| relatedToEvent | Indian Rebellion of 1857 ⓘ |
| usedFor |
annexation of princely states
ⓘ
territorial expansion ⓘ |
Referenced by (26)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
Doctrine of Lapse (contested pretext)
this entity surface form:
Doctrine of Lapse (applied by the British)
subject surface form:
Rani Lakshmibai
this entity surface form:
Doctrine of Lapse policy in India
this entity surface form:
Annexation of Jhansi under Doctrine of Lapse
this entity surface form:
Doctrine of Lapse–related agreements