Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk
E1201248
UNEXPLORED
Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held employees are not entitled to compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act for time spent in post-shift security screenings.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205769 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk]
-
A.
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to subject states to damages suits under the Family and Medical Leave Act as a valid exercise of its enforcement authority under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
B.
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
-
C.
Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000
Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited public-sector unions’ ability to collect special fees from nonmembers without their affirmative consent, strengthening First Amendment protections against compelled political speech.
-
D.
Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC
Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the standard for awarding attorney’s fees to prevailing defendants in Title VII civil rights cases, holding they may recover fees only when the plaintiff’s claim is frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation.
-
E.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk Target entity description: Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held employees are not entitled to compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act for time spent in post-shift security screenings.
-
A.
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs
Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to subject states to damages suits under the Family and Medical Leave Act as a valid exercise of its enforcement authority under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
B.
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
-
C.
Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000
Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited public-sector unions’ ability to collect special fees from nonmembers without their affirmative consent, strengthening First Amendment protections against compelled political speech.
-
D.
Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC
Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the standard for awarding attorney’s fees to prevailing defendants in Title VII civil rights cases, holding they may recover fees only when the plaintiff’s claim is frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation.
-
E.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.