United States v. Apel
E1201243
UNEXPLORED
United States v. Apel is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the federal government's authority to enforce protest restrictions on military installations, even in areas with public access.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States v. Apel canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205764 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Apel Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, United States v. Apel]
-
A.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
B.
United States v. Basye
United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
United States v. Rabinowitz
United States v. Rabinowitz is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed Fourth Amendment protections by upholding a warrantless search incident to a lawful arrest.
-
E.
United States v. Classic
United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Apel Target entity description: United States v. Apel is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the federal government's authority to enforce protest restrictions on military installations, even in areas with public access.
-
A.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
B.
United States v. Basye
United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
United States v. Rabinowitz
United States v. Rabinowitz is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed Fourth Amendment protections by upholding a warrantless search incident to a lawful arrest.
-
E.
United States v. Classic
United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.