Ten Modes of Aenesidemus
E1157563
UNEXPLORED
The Ten Modes of Aenesidemus are a set of skeptical arguments in ancient Greek philosophy designed to suspend judgment by highlighting the relativity and uncertainty of human perception and belief.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Ten Modes of Aenesidemus canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T15454878 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ten Modes of Aenesidemus Context triple: [Pyrrhonian skepticism, includes, Ten Modes of Aenesidemus]
-
A.
Sophistical Refutations
Sophistical Refutations is an Aristotelian treatise that analyzes fallacious arguments and explains how to detect and refute them in dialectical reasoning.
-
B.
The Incoherence of the Philosophers
The Incoherence of the Philosophers is a landmark 11th-century work of Islamic philosophy and theology by Al-Ghazali that critiques the metaphysical doctrines of earlier Muslim philosophers and helped reshape the course of Islamic thought.
-
C.
Commentaries on Plato
Commentaries on Plato is a series of Byzantine philosophical works in which Michael Psellos analyzes and interprets Plato’s dialogues within a Christian intellectual framework.
-
D.
Contra Celsum
Contra Celsum is a major apologetic work by the early Christian theologian Origen, written in the 3rd century as a detailed rebuttal of the pagan philosopher Celsus’s criticisms of Christianity.
-
E.
Commentaries on Aristotle
Commentaries on Aristotle are a series of influential medieval philosophical and theological works in which St. Thomas Aquinas analyzes and interprets Aristotle’s writings, integrating them with Christian thought.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ten Modes of Aenesidemus Target entity description: The Ten Modes of Aenesidemus are a set of skeptical arguments in ancient Greek philosophy designed to suspend judgment by highlighting the relativity and uncertainty of human perception and belief.
-
A.
Sophistical Refutations
Sophistical Refutations is an Aristotelian treatise that analyzes fallacious arguments and explains how to detect and refute them in dialectical reasoning.
-
B.
The Incoherence of the Philosophers
The Incoherence of the Philosophers is a landmark 11th-century work of Islamic philosophy and theology by Al-Ghazali that critiques the metaphysical doctrines of earlier Muslim philosophers and helped reshape the course of Islamic thought.
-
C.
Commentaries on Plato
Commentaries on Plato is a series of Byzantine philosophical works in which Michael Psellos analyzes and interprets Plato’s dialogues within a Christian intellectual framework.
-
D.
Contra Celsum
Contra Celsum is a major apologetic work by the early Christian theologian Origen, written in the 3rd century as a detailed rebuttal of the pagan philosopher Celsus’s criticisms of Christianity.
-
E.
Commentaries on Aristotle
Commentaries on Aristotle are a series of influential medieval philosophical and theological works in which St. Thomas Aquinas analyzes and interprets Aristotle’s writings, integrating them with Christian thought.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.