Triple

T9991634
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Trang Tien area E196898 entity
Predicate commonForeignLanguageInArea P24056 FINISHED
Object English LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Trang Tien area, commonForeignLanguageInArea, English]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonForeignLanguageInArea
Context triple: [Trang Tien area, commonForeignLanguageInArea, English]
  • A. isWidelySpokenIn
    Indicates that a language is spoken by a large portion of the population across many regions or communities within a specified area.
  • B. languageArea
    Indicates the geographic or cultural region in which a particular language is used or predominantly spoken.
  • C. hasLanguageOfSurroundingCountries
    Indicates that an entity uses or includes the languages commonly spoken in the countries that geographically surround it.
  • D. isLinguaFrancaOf chosen
    Indicates that a language serves as a common medium of communication between speakers of different native languages within a particular region, community, or context.
  • E. regionLanguage
    Indicates that a particular language is used or officially recognized within a specific geographic region.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82f1678c819093d06320a05f16a4 completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdcb95842c8190b8cdce9584f19840 completed April 2, 2026, 1:51 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd1da07db88190945bcdab3ca82e71 completed April 1, 2026, 1:29 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:50 p.m.