Triple
T9991150
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sulpicians |
E196887
|
entity |
| Predicate | vowsType |
P72121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | promises rather than religious vows |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: promises rather than religious vows | Statement: [Sulpicians, vowsType, promises rather than religious vows]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vowsType Context triple: [Sulpicians, vowsType, promises rather than religious vows]
-
A.
vowsTo
Indicates a commitment or solemn promise made by one entity to another to perform, uphold, or refrain from specific actions.
-
B.
hasTypeOfVows
chosen
Indicates that one entity is characterized by or associated with a particular kind or category of vows.
-
C.
observesVows
Indicates that an entity faithfully keeps, honors, or adheres to vows or solemn promises made.
-
D.
vowsLocation
Indicates the place where vows are made, exchanged, or formally declared between parties.
-
E.
vowStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a commitment or promise made between entities, such as whether it is active, fulfilled, or broken.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82f1678c819093d06320a05f16a4 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdc7a0cb6481908d7bd1b43f93bd18 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 1:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1da07db88190945bcdab3ca82e71 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:50 p.m.