Triple
T998736
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saenz v. Roe |
E21553
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfRestrictionChallenged |
P10734
|
FINISHED |
| Object | welfare benefit limitation for new residents |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: welfare benefit limitation for new residents | Statement: [Saenz v. Roe, typeOfRestrictionChallenged, welfare benefit limitation for new residents]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfRestrictionChallenged Context triple: [Saenz v. Roe, typeOfRestrictionChallenged, welfare benefit limitation for new residents]
-
A.
canBeChallengedOn
Indicates that one entity’s claim, decision, or status is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another entity.
-
B.
mayBeChallengedBy
Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to be opposed, questioned, or contested by another entity.
-
C.
challengedStatute
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
-
D.
notableRestriction
chosen
Indicates that there is a significant limitation, constraint, or prohibition that meaningfully affects the entity or its use.
-
E.
formerLegalRestriction
Indicates that a legal restriction once applied to an entity or relationship but is no longer in effect.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493c476b48190b41fc5e793171cc6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b4e2ad9c81908a0f488d3f261fc3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b2b057c48190b9e42df9246b3757 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.