Triple
T998707
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saenz v. Roe |
E21553
|
entity |
| Predicate | reargued |
P22319
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no | Statement: [Saenz v. Roe, reargued, no]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reargued Context triple: [Saenz v. Roe, reargued, no]
-
A.
arguesThat
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
B.
appeal
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
-
C.
reversed
Indicates that the direction or order of a previously defined relationship or sequence between entities is inverted.
-
D.
repealed
Indicates that a law, rule, or regulation has been officially revoked or annulled so that it no longer has legal effect.
-
E.
reintroduced
Indicates that an entity that was previously removed, extinct, or absent has been brought back or restored to a place, context, or state.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493c476b48190b41fc5e793171cc6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b4e2ad9c81908a0f488d3f261fc3 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b2b057c48190b9e42df9246b3757 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b3a02ea481909555cf5b7bed0d9a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.