Triple
T9978211
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NTLM |
E196384
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | challenge–response authentication protocol |
C994
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: challenge–response authentication protocol Context triple: [NTLM, instanceOf, challenge–response authentication protocol]
-
A.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
B.
cryptographic protocol
chosen
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
-
C.
Wi‑Fi authentication method
A Wi‑Fi authentication method is a mechanism that verifies and authorizes devices to access a wireless network, typically using credentials, encryption protocols, or security certificates.
-
D.
cryptographic protocol message
A cryptographic protocol message is a structured unit of data exchanged between parties in a cryptographic protocol, containing information such as identifiers, nonces, keys, and signatures to achieve security goals like confidentiality, integrity, and authentication.
-
E.
IEEE 802.11 security mechanism
An IEEE 802.11 security mechanism is a protocol or feature within Wi‑Fi standards designed to provide authentication, confidentiality, and integrity protection for wireless network communications.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82efbce081908179b4b9c65096eb |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:49 p.m.