Triple

T9976126
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Countess of Angoulême E196331 entity
Predicate feudalRankWithin P66828 FINISHED
Object peerage of medieval France LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: peerage of medieval France | Statement: [Countess of Angoulême, feudalRankWithin, peerage of medieval France]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: feudalRankWithin
Context triple: [Countess of Angoulême, feudalRankWithin, peerage of medieval France]
  • A. feudalStatus
    Indicates the hierarchical social or legal position an entity holds within a feudal system, such as lord, vassal, or serf.
  • B. nobleRankIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity holds a specified noble rank within a particular political or territorial jurisdiction.
  • C. nobleRankInHierarchy
    Indicates the relative position or level of a noble title within a structured hierarchy of ranks.
  • D. rankRelativeToPeerage
    Indicates how an entity’s hierarchical rank compares to that of a specified peer or peer group within a defined ranking system.
  • E. feudalType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of feudal relationship, structure, or tenure that applies between the related entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82eea2b88190a0e511d21a31f386 completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb84b47308190aa2f94fa7320cdc3 completed April 2, 2026, 12:28 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd1d9daa808190b413a1b9a1e929e2 completed April 1, 2026, 1:29 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:48 p.m.