Triple

T996568
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Louis Armstrong E21507 entity
Predicate spouse P13 FINISHED
Object Lucille Wilson E78924 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lucille Wilson | Statement: [Louis Armstrong, spouse, Lucille Wilson]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lucille Wilson
Context triple: [Louis Armstrong, spouse, Lucille Wilson]
  • A. Lucille Wilson chosen
    Lucille Wilson was the fourth wife of jazz legend Louis Armstrong, known for her long marriage to him and for preserving and promoting his legacy.
  • B. Lucille Campbell Green
    Lucille Campbell Green was an educator and civil rights activist best known as the wife and partner of prominent labor and civil rights leader A. Philip Randolph.
  • C. Lucille Sheardown
    Lucille Sheardown was one of the later wives of American inventor Lee de Forest, associated with his personal life rather than his pioneering work in radio and electronics.
  • D. Leola Brown
    Leola Brown was the wife of Oliver Brown, the named plaintiff in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court school desegregation case Brown v. Board of Education.
  • E. Mary McBride Smith
    Mary McBride Smith was the wife of renowned American film director John Ford.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493c476b48190b41fc5e793171cc6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b4df6dcc819084a7c0a50637a2c2 completed March 1, 2026, 9:51 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ad795f4874819087c47f1fd989ccff completed March 8, 2026, 1:27 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.