Triple

T996518
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cynewulf E21506 entity
Predicate authorshipEvidence P21693 FINISHED
Object runic signatures within his works LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: runic signatures within his works | Statement: [Cynewulf, authorshipEvidence, runic signatures within his works]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authorshipEvidence
Context triple: [Cynewulf, authorshipEvidence, runic signatures within his works]
  • A. authorshipStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of an entity’s role as an author in relation to a work (e.g., confirmed, disputed, anonymous, or pending).
  • B. probableAuthorOf
    Indicates that an entity is likely, but not certainly, the author or creator of another entity.
  • C. hasAuthor
    Indicates that an entity is written or created by a specific author.
  • D. partOfAuthorBibliography
    Indicates that a work is included in the set of publications that make up an author's bibliography.
  • E. isPosthumousWorkOf
    Indicates that a work was created, published, or became known only after the death of the person with whom it is associated.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493c476b48190b41fc5e793171cc6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b4df6dcc819084a7c0a50637a2c2 completed March 1, 2026, 9:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b2af071c819086c374a16307dfe0 completed March 1, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4b30efd2c8190b780a6dee086d0aa completed March 1, 2026, 9:43 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.