Triple

T9959625
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Camp VI E195532 entity
Predicate detaineeRegime P50528 FINISHED
Object highly controlled conditions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: highly controlled conditions | Statement: [Camp VI, detaineeRegime, highly controlled conditions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: detaineeRegime
Context triple: [Camp VI, detaineeRegime, highly controlled conditions]
  • A. detainedBy
    Indicates that an entity is being held in custody or confinement by another entity, typically an authority or controlling party.
  • B. detentionType chosen
    Indicates the specific category or form of detention applied to an entity within a custodial or restrictive context.
  • C. detaineeStatus
    Indicates the current legal or custodial condition of a person being detained, such as whether they are in custody, released, or under a specific detention regime.
  • D. placeOfDetention
    Indicates the location or facility where an entity is or was held in detention.
  • E. detainedFor
    Indicates that one entity is being held in custody or confinement because of, or as a consequence of, another entity (such as a reason, charge, or event).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82eaaa008190a54fa1a9f954b9ad completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb6d08fdc8190a77b9c97830035bc completed April 2, 2026, 12:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd1d9ae19c819099fb3635e57c79be completed April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:46 p.m.