Triple
T9959251
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pragmatic Sanction of 1830 |
E195523
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusBefore |
P91663
|
FINISHED |
| Object | male-only succession under Salic law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: male-only succession under Salic law | Statement: [Pragmatic Sanction of 1830, legalStatusBefore, male-only succession under Salic law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusBefore Context triple: [Pragmatic Sanction of 1830, legalStatusBefore, male-only succession under Salic law]
-
A.
legalStatusAtIssue
Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the central subject of dispute, consideration, or determination in a legal context.
-
B.
legalStatusBeforeRelease
Indicates the legal condition or classification an entity was subject to prior to its release.
-
C.
politicalStatusBefore
Indicates the political status or condition an entity held prior to a specified event, change, or reference point.
-
D.
legalStatusChangedIn
Indicates that an entity’s legal status was altered or reclassified within a specified jurisdiction, context, or time frame.
-
E.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82eaaa008190a54fa1a9f954b9ad |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb6d08fdc8190a77b9c97830035bc |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d9ae19c819099fb3635e57c79be |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd36f112bc81908b473787e702de2f |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:46 p.m.