Triple

T9958000
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shamir secret sharing scheme E195491 entity
Predicate shareSize P91653 FINISHED
Object each share has size equal to the secret size LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: each share has size equal to the secret size | Statement: [Shamir secret sharing scheme, shareSize, each share has size equal to the secret size]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: shareSize
Context triple: [Shamir secret sharing scheme, shareSize, each share has size equal to the secret size]
  • A. sharesBaseWith
    Indicates that two entities have a common underlying base element, source, or component from which they are derived or constructed.
  • B. sharesIn
    Indicates that one entity holds or possesses shares or ownership stakes in another entity.
  • C. sharesBayWith
    Indicates that two locations are situated along or adjacent to the same bay.
  • D. sharesItem
    Indicates that one entity provides access to or distributes an item to another entity.
  • E. sharesSystemWith
    Indicates that two entities operate within or are associated with the same overarching system or environment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82eaaa008190a54fa1a9f954b9ad completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb6cceb608190ad4424afaddcabfa completed April 2, 2026, 12:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd1d9ae19c819099fb3635e57c79be completed April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd36f112bc81908b473787e702de2f completed April 1, 2026, 3:17 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:46 p.m.