Triple
T9957409
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Task View |
E195478
|
entity |
| Predicate | replacesOrExtends |
P21015
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Alt+Tab task switching interface |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alt+Tab task switching interface | Statement: [Task View, replacesOrExtends, Alt+Tab task switching interface]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: replacesOrExtends Context triple: [Task View, replacesOrExtends, Alt+Tab task switching interface]
-
A.
seeksToReplace
chosen
Indicates an intention or effort by one entity to take over the role, function, or position currently held by another entity.
-
B.
mayBeReplacedBy
Indicates that one entity can potentially be substituted or superseded by another entity.
-
C.
replacedWith
Indicates that one entity has been substituted or superseded by another entity, taking over its role, function, or position.
-
D.
replacesInPractice
Indicates that one entity has effectively taken over the role, function, or use of another entity in real-world application or usage.
-
E.
extendsTo
Indicates that one entity reaches, stretches, or continues its scope, influence, or coverage up to or into another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82eaaa008190a54fa1a9f954b9ad |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb6cceb608190ad4424afaddcabfa |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d9ae19c819099fb3635e57c79be |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:46 p.m.