Triple
T9955695
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hungarian People’s Army |
E195441
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedDoctrineOf |
P27401
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Soviet military doctrine |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Soviet military doctrine | Statement: [Hungarian People’s Army, usedDoctrineOf, Soviet military doctrine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedDoctrineOf Context triple: [Hungarian People’s Army, usedDoctrineOf, Soviet military doctrine]
-
A.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
B.
followsDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one entity adheres to, complies with, or acts in accordance with a specified doctrine or set of guiding principles.
-
C.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
-
D.
appliedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
-
E.
developedDoctrine
Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82eaaa008190a54fa1a9f954b9ad |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb69631d08190ab2b1d1c22d46da7 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d97c44081908730071269f07712 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:46 p.m.