Triple
T9954458
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brant County census division |
E195410
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Onondaga, Ontario |
E760909
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Onondaga, Ontario | Statement: [Brant County census division, contains, Onondaga, Ontario]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Onondaga, Ontario Context triple: [Brant County census division, contains, Onondaga, Ontario]
-
A.
Onondaga, Ontario
chosen
Onondaga, Ontario is a small rural community located within the County of Brant in southwestern Ontario, Canada.
-
B.
Cayuga, Ontario
Cayuga, Ontario is a small community in southern Ontario that serves as the administrative and service hub for Haldimand County along the Grand River.
-
C.
Onondaga
The Onondaga are one of the original member nations of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy, historically based in what is now central New York.
-
D.
Oneida, Ontario
Oneida, Ontario is a small rural community located within Haldimand County in southern Ontario, Canada.
-
E.
Niagara County, New York
Niagara County, New York is a county in western New York State known for encompassing part of the Niagara Falls region along the U.S.–Canada border.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82eaaa008190a54fa1a9f954b9ad |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb694b95481909d049302818e7137 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:21 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d2294335208190a0483c4e89abb359 |
completed | April 5, 2026, 9:20 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:46 p.m.