Triple
T9950628
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marsh v. Chambers |
E195319
|
entity |
| Predicate | establishmentClause |
P52536
|
FINISHED |
| Object | did not find violation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: did not find violation | Statement: [Marsh v. Chambers, establishmentClause, did not find violation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: establishmentClause Context triple: [Marsh v. Chambers, establishmentClause, did not find violation]
-
A.
constitutionalClause
Indicates that one entity is a specific clause or provision contained within a constitution that governs or constrains another entity.
-
B.
supremacyClause
Indicates that one legal authority, rule, or agreement takes precedence over and invalidates conflicting lower-level laws or provisions.
-
C.
constitutionalClauseType
chosen
Indicates the specific type or category of a clause within a constitution that characterizes the nature of the constitutional provision.
-
D.
constitutionArticle
Indicates that one entity is an article or specific provision contained within the constitution represented by the other entity.
-
E.
citesConstitutionalProvision
Indicates that one legal document, decision, or argument explicitly references and relies on a specific provision of a constitution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e96a108190932bd1fc4acd73a0 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb65b83ac8190af6bd8c918ffb69f |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d97c44081908730071269f07712 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:45 p.m.