Triple
T9949991
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ELI-ALPS laser research center |
E195304
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Szeged |
E37566
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Szeged | Statement: [ELI-ALPS laser research center, locatedIn, Szeged]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Szeged Context triple: [ELI-ALPS laser research center, locatedIn, Szeged]
-
A.
Szeged
chosen
Szeged is a prominent city in southern Hungary known for its university, paprika production, and distinctive Art Nouveau architecture.
-
B.
Zalaegerszeg
Zalaegerszeg is a city in western Hungary that serves as the administrative center of Zala County and a regional economic and cultural hub.
-
C.
Debrecen
Debrecen is Hungary’s second-largest city and a key cultural, economic, and educational center in the country’s eastern region.
-
D.
Kaposvár
Kaposvár is a city in southwestern Hungary that serves as the administrative and cultural center of Somogy County.
-
E.
Békéscsaba
Békéscsaba is a city in southeastern Hungary known as the administrative center of Békés County and for its cultural and culinary traditions, including its famous sausage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e96a108190932bd1fc4acd73a0 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb65a4e6c8190968192a24aad1b7d |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:20 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f2802d74f081909c7af34bf266ae01 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:45 p.m.