Triple
T9949463
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Enide |
E195290
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipTestedBy |
P91316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Erec’s trials of her loyalty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Erec’s trials of her loyalty | Statement: [Enide, relationshipTestedBy, Erec’s trials of her loyalty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTestedBy Context triple: [Enide, relationshipTestedBy, Erec’s trials of her loyalty]
-
A.
relationshipType
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
B.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
C.
relatedTest
Indicates that there exists some form of connection or association between one test and another.
-
D.
showsRelationshipWith
Indicates that one entity visually or explicitly presents or demonstrates its connection or association with another entity.
-
E.
relationshipPlannedWith
Indicates that a relationship between two entities has been intentionally arranged or scheduled to occur in the future.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e96a108190932bd1fc4acd73a0 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb65a4e6c8190968192a24aad1b7d |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d97c44081908730071269f07712 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd358386f48190833c862b5b8c04b2 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:45 p.m.