Triple
T9945671
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Linux kernel release process |
E195196
|
entity |
| Predicate | afterMergeWindow |
P91290
|
FINISHED |
| Object | first release candidate (rc1) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: first release candidate (rc1) | Statement: [Linux kernel release process, afterMergeWindow, first release candidate (rc1)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: afterMergeWindow Context triple: [Linux kernel release process, afterMergeWindow, first release candidate (rc1)]
-
A.
behaviorAfterMerge
Indicates the resulting behavior or state of an entity or system after two or more components have been merged.
-
B.
missionAfterMerge
Indicates that one mission occurs or is valid only after another mission has been merged or combined into it.
-
C.
hasMerger
Indicates a relationship where two or more entities combine into a single entity through a merger event.
-
D.
mergedByProcess
Indicates that one or more entities are combined or unified as the result of a specific process.
-
E.
canMerge
Indicates that two or more entities are compatible in such a way that they can be combined into a single unified entity or structure.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e96a108190932bd1fc4acd73a0 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb61561848190aba7250f3b3c4ed5 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d97c44081908730071269f07712 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd358386f48190833c862b5b8c04b2 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:45 p.m.