Triple
T9944647
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 862 |
E194171
|
entity |
| Predicate | describesBehavior |
P264
|
FINISHED |
| Object | server returns received data unchanged |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: server returns received data unchanged | Statement: [RFC 862, describesBehavior, server returns received data unchanged]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: describesBehavior Context triple: [RFC 862, describesBehavior, server returns received data unchanged]
-
A.
definingBehavior
Indicates the characteristic action or pattern of actions that fundamentally determines or typifies how something functions or is understood.
-
B.
describes
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides an explanation, representation, or account of another entity or concept.
-
C.
shapesBehaviorOf
Indicates that one entity influences, determines, or constrains the way another entity behaves or acts.
-
D.
behaviorCode
Indicates the specific rule, standard, or classification code that governs or characterizes an entity’s behavior in a given context.
-
E.
behaviorObserved
Indicates that a particular behavior or action has been witnessed, recorded, or detected in relation to an entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e409348190a393777356b80a2a |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb61561848190aba7250f3b3c4ed5 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d97c44081908730071269f07712 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:45 p.m.