Triple
T9932050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CDS (Child DS) |
E192668
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayBeIgnoredBy |
P83566
|
FINISHED |
| Object | parent zone not implementing CDS automation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: parent zone not implementing CDS automation | Statement: [CDS (Child DS), mayBeIgnoredBy, parent zone not implementing CDS automation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeIgnoredBy Context triple: [CDS (Child DS), mayBeIgnoredBy, parent zone not implementing CDS automation]
-
A.
mayBeIgnoredByClients
chosen
Indicates that the associated element is optional and can be safely disregarded or not processed by clients without affecting core functionality.
-
B.
ignoredBy
Indicates that one entity does not pay attention or respond to another entity.
-
C.
mayBeOmittedWhen
Indicates that one element is allowed to be left out or excluded under certain conditions defined by another element or context.
-
D.
mayReject
Indicates that one entity has the authority or option to refuse, decline, or not accept another entity or proposal.
-
E.
canBeRemovedBy
Indicates that one entity is capable of eliminating, detaching, or undoing another entity or its effect.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82dd978c8190947124ab0d3315ac |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb5b54f348190b8e70e7beff6098a |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d9428cc81909b4b4938566d78a7 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:43 p.m.