Triple
T9910084
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Belgian football league system |
E185117
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalReform |
P43367
|
FINISHED |
| Object | league reform of 2016 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: league reform of 2016 | Statement: [Belgian football league system, historicalReform, league reform of 2016]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalReform Context triple: [Belgian football league system, historicalReform, league reform of 2016]
-
A.
notableReform
Indicates that an entity is recognized for having initiated, led, or been central to a significant reform or transformative change in a system, policy, or institution.
-
B.
lastReform
chosen
Indicates the most recent reform or change that was applied to an entity, typically linking the entity to its latest reform event or version.
-
C.
historicalModification
Indicates that one entity has altered, updated, or otherwise changed another entity at some point in the past, with the modification recorded as part of its history.
-
D.
timeOfMajorReforms
Indicates the specific time period during which significant reforms or major changes took place.
-
E.
historicalForm
Indicates that one entity is an earlier or historically attested form or variant of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca8296165881908ca4750701af1f29 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb51184d08190a0350f2722110811 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d8c584081908b73de75eb18e438 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:41 p.m.