Triple
T9879408
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 8 Days of Christmas |
E240161
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOriginalSongs |
P73613
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [8 Days of Christmas, hasOriginalSongs, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOriginalSongs Context triple: [8 Days of Christmas, hasOriginalSongs, true]
-
A.
containsOriginalSongs
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes or features songs that are original compositions rather than covers or adaptations.
-
B.
includesOriginalSongsBy
Indicates that one entity (such as a collection or work) contains original songs that are created or performed by another entity.
-
C.
originalSong
Indicates that one entity is the source or initial version of a song from which another entity (such as a cover, remix, or adaptation) is derived.
-
D.
hasSong
Indicates that one entity possesses, features, or includes a particular song.
-
E.
hasSpecialSong
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a particular song that is unique, distinctive, or specially designated for it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84e8a0788190b9061811d50fd554 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb4135c108190b3330e929509699d |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d810ed48190a252b70e9390c8f3 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:37 p.m.