Triple

T9874233
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Turkish Australians E240032 entity
Predicate representationIn P90996 FINISHED
Object Australian politics LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Australian politics | Statement: [Turkish Australians, representationIn, Australian politics]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: representationIn
Context triple: [Turkish Australians, representationIn, Australian politics]
  • A. representation
    Indicates that one entity stands in for, symbolizes, or depicts another entity in some context.
  • B. representedTo
    Indicates that one entity formally acted on behalf of or served as the representative of another entity in a given context or interaction.
  • C. formerRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity previously served as the representative (e.g., legal, political, or organizational) of another entity, but no longer holds that role.
  • D. areRepresentedBy
    Indicates that one entity serves as a representation, proxy, or stand-in for another entity.
  • E. representationType
    Indicates the specific form or mode in which something is represented or expressed (e.g., as a symbol, image, model, or description).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84e8a0788190b9061811d50fd554 completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb3f89fa081908b58956902c193cf completed April 2, 2026, 12:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd1d7621d48190aa6a6f34399514b0 completed April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd3581a9688190a00cef4c3eebb0ae completed April 1, 2026, 3:10 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:37 p.m.