Triple
T9871812
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Symphony No. 5 in E minor, Op. 64 |
E239973
|
entity |
| Predicate | thematicCharacter |
P90985
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fate |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fate | Statement: [Symphony No. 5 in E minor, Op. 64, thematicCharacter, fate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: thematicCharacter Context triple: [Symphony No. 5 in E minor, Op. 64, thematicCharacter, fate]
-
A.
characterTheme
Indicates that a particular theme, motif, or conceptual focus is associated with a given character.
-
B.
themeInvolvingCharacter
Indicates that a theme, motif, or abstract concept centrally involves or is significantly shaped by a particular character.
-
C.
mainThemeCharacter
Indicates that a character serves as the central or primary figure associated with the main theme of a work or narrative.
-
D.
hasMainThemeCharacter
Indicates that a work (such as a story, film, or game) features a specific character as its central or primary thematic focus.
-
E.
character1
Indicates that the subject is identified as the first or primary character in a narrative or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84e8a0788190b9061811d50fd554 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb3f5cc948190b03186b867c92229 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd1d7621d48190aa6a6f34399514b0 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd3581a9688190a00cef4c3eebb0ae |
completed | April 1, 2026, 3:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:36 p.m.