Triple
T9865229
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 4514 |
E239815
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletes |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
RFC 2253
RFC 2253 is an Internet standard that originally defined the textual representation of LDAP distinguished names, later superseded by RFC 4514.
|
E826107
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 2253 | Statement: [RFC 4514, obsoletes, RFC 2253]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 2253 Context triple: [RFC 4514, obsoletes, RFC 2253]
-
A.
RFC 4513
RFC 4513 is an IETF standard that specifies authentication methods and security mechanisms for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP).
-
B.
RFC 4510
RFC 4510 is an IETF standards-track document that specifies the core technical framework and protocol suite for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP).
-
C.
RFC 4514
RFC 4514 is an IETF standard that specifies the string representation of Distinguished Names in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP).
-
D.
RFC 4518
RFC 4518 is an Internet standard that specifies string preparation and comparison rules for use in LDAP directories.
-
E.
RFC 4519
RFC 4519 is an IETF specification that defines a standard set of schema attributes and object classes for use in LDAP directories.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: RFC 2253 Triple: [RFC 4514, obsoletes, RFC 2253]
Generated description
RFC 2253 is an Internet standard that originally defined the textual representation of LDAP distinguished names, later superseded by RFC 4514.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 2253 Target entity description: RFC 2253 is an Internet standard that originally defined the textual representation of LDAP distinguished names, later superseded by RFC 4514.
-
A.
RFC 4513
RFC 4513 is an IETF standard that specifies authentication methods and security mechanisms for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP).
-
B.
RFC 4510
RFC 4510 is an IETF standards-track document that specifies the core technical framework and protocol suite for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP).
-
C.
RFC 4514
RFC 4514 is an IETF standard that specifies the string representation of Distinguished Names in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP).
-
D.
RFC 4518
RFC 4518 is an Internet standard that specifies string preparation and comparison rules for use in LDAP directories.
-
E.
RFC 4519
RFC 4519 is an IETF specification that defines a standard set of schema attributes and object classes for use in LDAP directories.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84e7506c819095cbde4ff16512bb |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb3ba7f288190a15ebec2cc3112c4 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:09 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d1e44dc0b8819082294a479299814e |
completed | April 5, 2026, 4:25 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69d1e4a42ab0819085150f033c2a650a |
completed | April 5, 2026, 4:27 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69d1e50b803081909cd93a602fb48514 |
completed | April 5, 2026, 4:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:36 p.m.