Triple
T9852414
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Peel Commission partition proposal |
E239498
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposedRetentionOf |
P6164
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British control over Jerusalem |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: British control over Jerusalem | Statement: [Peel Commission partition proposal, proposedRetentionOf, British control over Jerusalem]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedRetentionOf Context triple: [Peel Commission partition proposal, proposedRetentionOf, British control over Jerusalem]
-
A.
retained
chosen
Indicates that one entity keeps possession, control, or continued engagement of another entity over a period of time.
-
B.
retentionMethod
Indicates the method or strategy used to retain or keep something (such as data, customers, or resources) over time.
-
C.
leafRetention
Indicates whether an entity retains its leaves (e.g., remains evergreen) or sheds them seasonally.
-
D.
subjectToRetentionElections
Indicates that an entity is required to undergo retention elections to determine whether it continues in its position or role.
-
E.
keptIn
Indicates that one entity is stored, contained, or maintained inside another entity as its location or container.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84e4fdc08190a624425bcef98665 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb375ba448190a32cca2b0f376ac1 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03e57cac8190914bb5ae608a6e0e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:34 p.m.