Triple
T9830287
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pulitzer–Hearst circulation war |
E238764
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMediaStyle |
P1609
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yellow journalism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yellow journalism | Statement: [Pulitzer–Hearst circulation war, hasMediaStyle, yellow journalism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMediaStyle Context triple: [Pulitzer–Hearst circulation war, hasMediaStyle, yellow journalism]
-
A.
hasMediaAppearanceIn
Indicates that an entity appears or is featured as media content within a specified media work, program, or publication.
-
B.
hasStyle
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
-
C.
hasBroadcastStyle
Indicates that one entity is characterized by, or associated with, a particular manner or style of broadcasting.
-
D.
hasSystemStyle
Indicates that one entity is associated with, or characterized by, a particular system-defined style of another entity.
-
E.
hasCommonMedia
Indicates that two entities share at least one media item (such as an image, video, or audio file) in common.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84e0dd1881909800765d1e21f735 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb3297bd88190bf8c53a4ba00e0ae |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03e30bc08190816c0a6d29c21b0f |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:32 p.m.