Triple
T9821323
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2001 Ugandan presidential election |
E238536
|
entity |
| Predicate | courtRulingSummary |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court acknowledged irregularities but upheld Museveni’s victory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court acknowledged irregularities but upheld Museveni’s victory | Statement: [2001 Ugandan presidential election, courtRulingSummary, Supreme Court acknowledged irregularities but upheld Museveni’s victory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: courtRulingSummary Context triple: [2001 Ugandan presidential election, courtRulingSummary, Supreme Court acknowledged irregularities but upheld Museveni’s victory]
-
A.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalRulingNature
Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
-
C.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
D.
courtReview
Indicates that a court formally examines a decision, action, or case to determine its legality, correctness, or appropriateness.
-
E.
constitutionalRuling
Indicates a formal judicial decision determining whether a law, policy, or government action complies with a constitution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84dfde1481909f47c286d715f892 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb3147ecc81908cfca84c05a367d9 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03e01ea881909a7d93fc3994ace5 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:31 p.m.