Triple
T9812050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Elrond |
E238295
|
entity |
| Predicate | chosenFate |
P90143
|
FINISHED |
| Object | To be counted among the Elves |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: To be counted among the Elves | Statement: [Elrond, chosenFate, To be counted among the Elves]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: chosenFate Context triple: [Elrond, chosenFate, To be counted among the Elves]
-
A.
chosenGoddess
Indicates that a particular goddess has been selected or designated, typically as a preferred, patron, or special deity in relation to an entity.
-
B.
fate
Indicates that an entity is destined or predetermined to experience a particular outcome or course of events beyond its control.
-
C.
eventualFate
Indicates the ultimate outcome or final state that an entity is destined to reach over time.
-
D.
viewOnFate
Indicates a relationship where one entity holds a particular belief, attitude, or perspective about fate or predestination.
-
E.
knowledgeOfFate
Indicates that one entity is aware of or understands the destined or predetermined outcome concerning another entity or event.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84defac48190abc1148804f184c1 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb222ba788190a9085272a3de7852 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03e01ea881909a7d93fc3994ace5 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd06abc9248190a506b64e9c516d03 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:30 p.m.