Triple
T9799117
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Massiah v. United States |
E237789
|
entity |
| Predicate | excludesFromEvidence |
P90036
|
FINISHED |
| Object | incriminating statements deliberately elicited after indictment without counsel |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: incriminating statements deliberately elicited after indictment without counsel | Statement: [Massiah v. United States, excludesFromEvidence, incriminating statements deliberately elicited after indictment without counsel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: excludesFromEvidence Context triple: [Massiah v. United States, excludesFromEvidence, incriminating statements deliberately elicited after indictment without counsel]
-
A.
excludedFrom
Indicates that one entity is deliberately not included within the scope, membership, or applicability of another entity or set.
-
B.
excludes
Indicates that one entity deliberately omits, leaves out, or does not allow the inclusion of another entity within a set, group, or context.
-
C.
exemptedFrom
Indicates that an entity is not subject to, or is formally released from, a rule, obligation, requirement, or liability that would otherwise apply.
-
D.
hasNoEvidenceOf
Indicates that there is no supporting proof, data, or documentation confirming the existence or occurrence of the referenced condition, event, or relationship.
-
E.
exclusionBasis
Indicates the reason or criterion used to exclude an entity from a set, process, or consideration.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84dd4608819097ff4ed00feca280 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cda627cc2c81909ccc2e26751f5e85 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03da45a88190b71b1be3354c15a6 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd06abc9248190a506b64e9c516d03 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:51 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:28 p.m.