Triple

T9787151
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Red Guard Party E237513 entity
Predicate operatedInCommunity P88035 FINISHED
Object Chinese American communities LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chinese American communities | Statement: [Red Guard Party, operatedInCommunity, Chinese American communities]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: operatedInCommunity
Context triple: [Red Guard Party, operatedInCommunity, Chinese American communities]
  • A. operationalCommunity chosen
    Indicates a relationship where entities are part of, or associated with, the same functioning or actively collaborating community in carrying out operations or activities.
  • B. developedInCommunity
    Indicates that something was created, built, or advanced through the participation, collaboration, or support of a particular community.
  • C. hasCommunityIn
    Indicates that a community is present, active, or established within a specified location, platform, or context.
  • D. hasNearbyCommunity
    Indicates that one entity has another community located close to it in geographic or spatial terms.
  • E. hasCommunityArea
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, located in, or belongs to a particular community area.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84da927881909bda80caecad6010 completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cda211b0608190bc8ceb905d02db83 completed April 1, 2026, 10:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd03d77c6c81909b675955bf113320 completed April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:27 p.m.