Triple

T977638
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jurassic Park area (Universal Studios Japan) E21091 entity
Predicate hasVisualStyle P1609 FINISHED
Object realistic dinosaur aesthetic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: realistic dinosaur aesthetic | Statement: [Jurassic Park area (Universal Studios Japan), hasVisualStyle, realistic dinosaur aesthetic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasVisualStyle
Context triple: [Jurassic Park area (Universal Studios Japan), hasVisualStyle, realistic dinosaur aesthetic]
  • A. hasSignatureVisualStyle
    Indicates that an entity is characterized by a distinctive and recognizable visual style that sets it apart from others.
  • B. hasStyle chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
  • C. hasSubstyle
    Indicates that one style is a more specific or subordinate variant of another style within a hierarchical style structure.
  • D. hasHigherStyleThan
    Indicates that one entity’s style is considered superior or more fashionable than another’s.
  • E. hasView
    Indicates that one entity provides a visual perspective or outlook onto another entity or scene.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493c2b62c8190b616351789ec47f8 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b47861808190be56a7bbd926e658 completed March 1, 2026, 9:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b2a8a3b08190b4538e119b13f7f5 completed March 1, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.