Triple
T9775293
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mangaian dialect |
E237230
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of Cook Islands Māori |
C20781
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of Cook Islands Māori Context triple: [Mangaian dialect, instanceOf, regional variety of Cook Islands Māori]
-
A.
Cook Islands Māori dialect
chosen
The Cook Islands Māori dialect is a Polynesian language variety spoken in the Cook Islands, closely related to New Zealand Māori but with distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features.
-
B.
regional variety of Tuvaluan
A regional variety of Tuvaluan is a localized form of the Tuvaluan language characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, or grammatical features associated with a specific island or community within Tuvalu.
-
C.
regional variety of Fijian
A regional variety of Fijian is a localized form of the Fijian language characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and sometimes grammatical features associated with a specific geographic area or community in Fiji.
-
D.
Tepehua language variety
A Tepehua language variety is a specific regional or community-based form of the Tepehua language, distinguished by its own phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Totonacan language family.
-
E.
variety of Tongan language
A variety of Tongan language is a distinct form or dialect of Tongan characterized by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features associated with a particular region, community, or social group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d975a08190aab25b02a89bdab3 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:26 p.m.