Triple
T9767692
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | .net |
E237037
|
entity |
| Predicate | dnsZone |
P42015
|
FINISHED |
| Object | .net zone |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: .net zone | Statement: [.net, dnsZone, .net zone]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dnsZone Context triple: [.net, dnsZone, .net zone]
-
A.
DNSZone
chosen
Indicates a relationship where a set of DNS records is grouped and managed together under a specific domain namespace as a single administrative unit.
-
B.
ianaZoneFile
Indicates that an entity is associated with, defined by, or described in a specific IANA DNS zone file.
-
C.
DNS
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as or is associated with a Domain Name System (DNS) configuration or service for another entity, enabling the translation of domain names to network addresses.
-
D.
exampleZoneName
Indicates that an entity is associated with a zone identified by a specific example or placeholder name.
-
E.
rootZoneSigned
Indicates that the DNS root zone has been cryptographically signed, typically using DNSSEC, to provide data integrity and authentication.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d831b8819090322686b47887ce |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cda0a2da648190836916a45d2998d7 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03d3b68c81909e570401a891b9f2 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:38 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:25 p.m.