Triple
T9758455
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sobekneferu |
E236609
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedBothMaleAndFemaleTitles |
P90844
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Sobekneferu, usedBothMaleAndFemaleTitles, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedBothMaleAndFemaleTitles Context triple: [Sobekneferu, usedBothMaleAndFemaleTitles, true]
-
A.
hasGenderedTitle
Indicates that an entity is associated with a title or form of address that is explicitly marked for a particular gender.
-
B.
usesGenderAccurateLanguage
Indicates that the language employed in the context correctly reflects and respects the gender identities of the entities referenced.
-
C.
hasGenderInSomeTraditions
Indicates that, in at least some cultural, religious, or historical traditions, the subject is regarded as having a specific gender.
-
D.
honorificGender
Indicates that a particular honorific or title is associated with a specific gender or gendered form.
-
E.
hasGenderDistinction
Indicates that a relationship, classification, or linguistic form differentiates entities based on gender categories.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d64f6c8190a4ed4e9f5936eda5 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cda047d0408190b91f7195513da6e8 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03d0772c8190bd1750cf1cfba309 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:38 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd081a9c5c819093439be7e802ff85 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:57 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:24 p.m.