Triple
T9757247
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Senate of American Samoa |
E236582
|
entity |
| Predicate | notElectedBy |
P90843
|
FINISHED |
| Object | popular vote |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: popular vote | Statement: [Senate of American Samoa, notElectedBy, popular vote]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notElectedBy Context triple: [Senate of American Samoa, notElectedBy, popular vote]
-
A.
notRatifiedBy
Indicates that a proposed agreement, treaty, or decision has not received formal approval or confirmation from the specified entity.
-
B.
couldElect
Indicates that one entity has the potential or ability, under certain conditions or rules, to choose another entity for an office, role, or position through an election.
-
C.
nonVoting
Indicates that an entity participates in a group or organization without possessing the right to vote in its decisions.
-
D.
electedCandidate
Indicates that a particular person has been chosen as the winner in an election for a given position or office.
-
E.
electedWith
Indicates that one entity attained an elected position or office together with, or as part of the same electoral outcome as, another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d64f6c8190a4ed4e9f5936eda5 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cda046a4048190a2c66321a9911817 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03d0772c8190bd1750cf1cfba309 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:38 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69cd081a9c5c819093439be7e802ff85 |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:57 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:24 p.m.